How to Get Executive Buy-In for Accessibility Investment

Accessibility initiatives often struggle to get budget—not because the investment doesn't make sense, but because advocates present the case ineffectively. Executives respond to business language: risk, revenue, competitive advantage, and ROI. Leading with compliance requirements or moral arguments rarely wins budget in competitive resource environments.

This guide provides a framework for presenting accessibility investment to executives in terms that resonate with business decision-makers. You'll learn to quantify risk, demonstrate opportunity, address objections, and build the case that gets approved.

Why Traditional Accessibility Pitches Fail

Understanding why accessibility pitches fail helps you build better ones.

Compliance-Focused Pitches

The pitch: "We need to comply with WCAG and ADA requirements."

Why it fails: Compliance sounds like checkbox work with no upside. Executives hear cost without benefit. Additionally, many view compliance risk as abstract—"we haven't been sued yet, so why would we start worrying now?"

Ethics-Focused Pitches

The pitch: "Accessibility is the right thing to do for people with disabilities."

Why it fails: While true, this framing positions accessibility as charity rather than business investment. Budget gets allocated to revenue-generating activities first; "nice to have" initiatives get cut when resources tighten.

Technical-Focused Pitches

The pitch: "Our website has 2,500 WCAG violations that our development team needs to fix."

Why it fails: Technical details don't translate to executive understanding. 2,500 violations sounds like a big number, but without context about what it means for the business, it's just more technical debt competing with everything else.

The Executive-Resonant Pitch Framework

Effective accessibility pitches speak executive language. This framework reframes accessibility as strategic business investment.

Element 1: Lead with Risk

Executives are responsible for managing risk. Accessibility represents quantifiable legal and brand risk.

Frame the risk:

"We have documented exposure to [legal risk]. Our website has [X] violations that can be identified by automated scanning—the same tools plaintiff attorneys use. Similar companies in our industry face [Y%] probability of accessibility lawsuits, with average costs exceeding [$200,000] including settlements, legal fees, and mandatory remediation."

Provide specific data:

• 4,600+ ADA website lawsuits filed in 2023
• Your industry's specific lawsuit frequency
• Your company's specific violation count
• Named competitors or similar companies that have been sued

Quantify expected cost:

Expected Legal Cost = Lawsuit Probability × Average Lawsuit Cost

Example: 15% probability × $200,000 = $30,000 expected annual cost

Present risk as ongoing exposure, not one-time concern.

Element 2: Present the Revenue Opportunity

After establishing risk, pivot to opportunity. This shows accessibility isn't just defense—it's offense.

The market opportunity:

"We're leaving revenue on the table. The disability market represents $490 billion in annual spending power in the US—26% of adults have a disability. When our website is inaccessible, we're effectively posting a 'not welcome' sign for this market segment."

Quantify for your business:

Lost Revenue = Annual Revenue × 26% × Barrier Abandonment Rate × Capture Rate

Example: $25M × 26% × 50% × 25% = $812,500 annually

Competitive framing:

"Our accessible competitors are capturing this market. 95.9% of websites fail basic accessibility—companies that invest gain competitive advantage in an underserved market."

Element 3: Show Compound Benefits

Demonstrate that accessibility investment generates multiple return streams:

SEO improvement: "Accessibility and SEO share common foundations. Alt text helps Google understand images, semantic HTML improves crawlability. Our accessibility improvements should increase organic traffic by [10-20%]."

Conversion improvement: "Accessible sites convert better for everyone—not just users with disabilities. Clearer forms, better navigation, and improved readability help all users complete purchases. Industry data suggests [1-5%] conversion rate improvements."

Brand value: "Accessibility builds brand reputation and customer trust. This is increasingly important as consumers evaluate company values in purchasing decisions."

Element 4: Provide Clear Investment Ask

Executives need specific numbers and clear expectations.

Specific investment request:

"We need [$X] to assess and remediate critical accessibility barriers. This includes:

• Initial audit and prioritization: $[Y]
• Remediation of highest-priority issues: $[Z]
• Ongoing monitoring and maintenance: $[W]/year"

Clear timeline:

"We can reduce legal risk exposure significantly within [3 months] by addressing critical path issues. Comprehensive remediation will take [6-12 months] with sustained but declining investment after initial remediation."

Expected outcomes:

"This investment should deliver:

• [X%] reduction in legal risk exposure
• [$Y] in captured market opportunity annually
• [Z%] organic traffic improvement
• Measurable conversion rate improvement"

Element 5: Calculate ROI

Close with clear return calculation:

Investment Required: $50,000 (year 1)
Annual Benefits:
  - Legal risk reduction: $30,000
  - Market expansion: $200,000
  - SEO improvement: $50,000
  - Conversion improvement: $100,000
Total Annual Benefit: $380,000
Year 1 ROI: 660%

Detailed ROI calculation frameworks provide additional depth.

Handling Common Executive Objections

Anticipate and prepare for objections.

"We haven't been sued yet"

Response: "Lawsuit frequency is increasing—4,600+ last year versus 800 in 2017. Our industry is particularly targeted. Additionally, accessibility barriers cost us revenue every day through lost customers, even without lawsuits. Waiting increases both legal probability and remediation cost."

"It's too expensive right now"

Response: "Remediation costs are a fraction of lawsuit costs—typically 10-25%. Our current exposure exceeds $[X] in expected legal costs plus $[Y] in lost market opportunity. Not investing actually costs more than investing."

"Can't we just add an overlay?"

Response: "Overlays don't provide legal protection—sites using overlays still get sued. They also create ongoing annual costs ($500-5,000/year) without fixing underlying issues. Proper remediation costs more upfront but eliminates the problem rather than masking it."

"We'll do it in the redesign"

Response: "Every month we delay costs revenue through lost customers and increases lawsuit probability. We can start with critical path fixes immediately—checkout, product pages, navigation—while planning comprehensive work for the redesign. This reduces risk now while building toward complete compliance."

"Other priorities are more urgent"

Response: "I understand competing priorities. But accessibility affects all other initiatives—marketing campaigns reach fewer customers, product launches face accessibility lawsuits, customer service handles complaints we could prevent. Address this foundation and other initiatives become more effective."

"How do I know this will actually help?"

Response: "We'll track measurable outcomes: violation counts reduced, conversion rates, organic traffic, customer feedback. We can establish baseline metrics now and report progress monthly. If we're not seeing expected returns, we can adjust approach."

Building Internal Champions

Executive buy-in is easier with organizational momentum behind the request.

Legal and Compliance Partnership

Legal teams understand risk language. Engage them by:

• Sharing lawsuit statistics for your industry
• Documenting your current violation exposure
• Asking their assessment of legal risk
• Requesting they co-present the business case

Legal support adds weight to risk arguments.

Customer Experience Partnership

Customer experience teams see accessibility barriers as customer friction:

• Share data on customer complaints related to accessibility
• Connect accessibility to customer satisfaction scores
• Frame as removing barriers to purchase completion
• Request they co-present customer impact

Marketing Partnership

Marketing teams value brand differentiation:

• Position accessibility as brand story opportunity
• Connect to broader DEI messaging
• Highlight competitor vulnerabilities
• Frame as content marketing opportunity

Finance Partnership

Finance teams respond to ROI arguments:

• Present detailed cost-benefit analysis
• Show comparison to other marketing investments
• Document risk-adjusted returns
• Request they validate calculations

The Presentation Structure

Structure your executive presentation for maximum impact.

Opening (2 minutes)

Hook with risk: "Last year, over 4,600 ADA website lawsuits were filed—companies like [competitor/similar company] have been targeted. Our website has [X] documented violations using the same tools plaintiff attorneys use."

Problem (5 minutes)

Quantify exposure:

• Legal risk numbers
• Market opportunity lost
• Competitive disadvantage
• Current violation count with context

Solution (5 minutes)

Present the investment:

• What needs to happen
• What it costs
• What timeline looks like
• What resources are needed

Benefits (5 minutes)

Show the upside:

• Risk reduction
• Revenue opportunity
• SEO improvement
• Conversion gains
• Brand benefits

ROI (3 minutes)

Prove the math:

• Total investment required
• Total annual benefits
• Net ROI calculation
• Comparison to alternatives

Ask (2 minutes)

Clear call to action: "I'm requesting approval for [$X] to begin assessment and high-priority remediation. This investment should deliver [ROI%] return within the first year while significantly reducing our legal exposure."

Q&A (5+ minutes)

Address objections with prepared responses.

Supporting Materials

Strengthen your pitch with supporting documentation.

Executive Summary Document

One-page overview with:

• Key risk metrics
• Investment request
• Expected returns
• Timeline summary

Detailed Business Case

Comprehensive document including:

• Full ROI analysis
• Industry lawsuit data
• Competitive analysis
• Implementation plan
• Success metrics

Site-Specific Data

TestParty's free scan provides:

• Current violation count
• Violation severity breakdown
• Priority remediation items
• Baseline for measuring progress

This site-specific data makes abstract risk concrete and actionable.

After Getting Approval

Buy-in is the beginning, not the end. Maintain executive support through:

Regular Progress Reporting

• Monthly violation count updates
• Quarterly business impact metrics
• Milestone completion updates
• Budget tracking

Visible Quick Wins

• Prioritize fixes that demonstrate progress
• Document before/after improvements
• Share customer feedback improvements
• Celebrate compliance milestones

Ongoing ROI Demonstration

• Track metrics committed in business case
• Report actuals versus projections
• Adjust approach based on results
• Build case for continued investment

FAQ: Getting Accessibility Buy-In

What's the most effective argument for accessibility investment?

Lead with risk quantification—lawsuit statistics, your company's specific violation count, and expected legal costs. Executives understand risk management. Follow with revenue opportunity in the disability market. Close with ROI calculation showing investment return. This sequence (risk → opportunity → return) resonates with business decision-makers.

How do I respond when executives say it's too expensive?

Compare accessibility investment to lawsuit costs and lost revenue. Typical remediation costs $25,000-$75,000, while a single lawsuit costs $200,000+. Frame non-investment as the more expensive option by quantifying ongoing risk and lost market opportunity.

What if my company has never been sued for accessibility?

Lawsuit frequency is increasing annually. Your current non-sued status reflects probability, not immunity. Additionally, frame accessibility beyond lawsuits—you're losing revenue daily through customers who can't complete purchases. The business case doesn't require lawsuit history.

How do I get data about our specific accessibility violations?

Automated accessibility scanning tools identify WCAG violations across your website. TestParty's free scan provides site-specific violation counts, severity ratings, and priority issues—exactly the data needed to make abstract risk concrete in executive presentations.

What metrics should I commit to in my business case?

Commit to measurable outcomes: violation count reduction (e.g., "reduce critical violations by 80%"), compliance percentage improvement, and leading indicators of business impact (organic traffic, conversion rates). Avoid committing to outcomes you can't control (lawsuit prevention) and focus on actions and measurable accessibility improvement.

Build Your Executive-Ready Business Case

Accessibility investment delivers strong ROI—but only if approved. Build business cases that speak executive language: quantified risk, market opportunity, and clear returns.

Start with data that makes the case concrete. TestParty's AI-powered platform scans your entire website, providing violation counts and severity ratings you need for compelling executive presentations.

Get your free accessibility scan →

Our approach: technology augments humans. AI contributed to drafting this guide, with our accessibility professionals ensuring accuracy. We recommend treating this as educational context, not definitive advice for your specific situation—though we're happy to provide that too.

This article originated in our TestParty research department. We've decided to publish it openly rather than keeping it for customers only. Accessibility expertise benefits from being shared widely, not hoarded.

Related Articles

• The ROI of Digital Accessibility: A Data-Driven Business Case
• eCommerce Accessibility Lawsuits: Why Online Retailers Are Prime Targets
• The $13 Trillion Disability Market: Why Smart Businesses Are Prioritizing Accessibility