2025 ADA Website Lawsuit Statistics: Industries Most at Risk
Website accessibility lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act continue to represent significant legal risk for organizations operating online. Understanding litigation patterns—which industries are targeted, what violations trigger lawsuits, and how case volumes are trending—helps organizations assess their risk exposure and prioritize compliance efforts.
This analysis examines current ADA website litigation trends, identifies high-risk industries, and provides context for organizations evaluating their accessibility compliance strategy.
ADA Website Litigation Landscape
The volume of website accessibility lawsuits filed in federal courts has grown substantially over the past decade. While exact numbers vary by tracking methodology, thousands of ADA website accessibility lawsuits are filed annually in federal courts. State court filings add significantly to this total.
How Website Accessibility Lawsuits Work
Most website accessibility cases follow a predictable pattern:
1. Identification: Plaintiffs or their attorneys identify websites with accessibility barriers. Many plaintiffs file numerous cases—sometimes hundreds—against different organizations.
2. Documentation: Before filing, plaintiffs document specific accessibility barriers. This typically includes automated scanning results and descriptions of barriers encountered while using assistive technology.
3. Demand Letter: Many cases begin with demand letters requesting settlement before formal litigation. Organizations receiving demand letters face decisions about whether to negotiate, remediate, or wait for formal filing.
4. Lawsuit Filing: Formal complaints are filed in federal court (citing ADA Title III) or state court (citing state accessibility laws). New York, California, and Florida see disproportionate filing volumes.
5. Settlement or Litigation: The vast majority of cases settle before trial. Settlement typically includes monetary payment, agreement to remediate accessibility barriers, and attorney fee coverage.
Common Lawsuit Claims
Website accessibility lawsuits typically allege violations of ADA Title III, which prohibits discrimination in places of public accommodation. Common specific allegations include:
- Inaccessible navigation preventing screen reader users from browsing products
- Missing alternative text for images
- Forms without proper labels
- Keyboard navigation barriers
- Video content without captions
- Color contrast failures
- Inaccessible checkout processes
Complaints typically reference WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) as the technical standard, though the ADA doesn't formally adopt WCAG. Courts have consistently looked to WCAG as the appropriate benchmark for evaluating website accessibility.
Industries Most at Risk
Litigation patterns show clear industry concentration. Some sectors face dramatically higher lawsuit volumes than others.
E-commerce and Retail
Online retail consistently ranks among the most-sued categories. The combination of high consumer traffic, transaction-based interactions, and broad public accessibility makes e-commerce sites frequent targets.
Risk Factors:
- High-volume consumer transactions
- Complex product catalogs requiring extensive alt text
- Interactive features (filters, configurators, size guides)
- Checkout processes with form-heavy interactions
- Third-party app integrations
Common Issues:
- Product image alt text missing or inadequate
- Filter and sort functionality inaccessible
- Checkout form labeling problems
- Payment integration accessibility barriers
For e-commerce specific guidance, see our Shopify Accessibility Requirements guide.
Food Service and Restaurants
Restaurant websites face substantial litigation, particularly chains with online ordering capabilities. Menu accessibility, location finders, and ordering systems create multiple potential barrier points.
Risk Factors:
- Online ordering becoming standard expectation
- Menu content often in inaccessible formats (images, PDFs)
- Location finders with map integration
- Reservation systems with complex interactions
Common Issues:
- Menus as images without text alternatives
- PDF menus without accessibility remediation
- Map-based location finders inaccessible to screen readers
- Online ordering form accessibility
Healthcare
Healthcare websites carry elevated risk due to the critical nature of accessing health information and services. Patient portals, appointment scheduling, and health content accessibility create compliance pressure.
Risk Factors:
- Life-and-health criticality of access
- Complex patient portal functionality
- Regulatory overlay (Section 508 for some providers)
- Telehealth accessibility requirements
Common Issues:
- Patient portal accessibility barriers
- Appointment scheduling form problems
- Health content in inaccessible PDF formats
- Telehealth platform accessibility
Hospitality and Travel
Hotels, airlines, and travel services face ongoing litigation. Booking processes, property information, and travel planning functionality create accessibility requirements.
Risk Factors:
- Complex booking flows
- Property/route selection interactions
- International operations with varied compliance standards
- Mobile app accessibility requirements
Common Issues:
- Booking form accessibility
- Room/seat selection tool accessibility
- Property photo alt text
- Interactive maps and location tools
Financial Services
Banks, insurance companies, and financial service providers face accessibility litigation tied to account access and financial transaction capabilities.
Risk Factors:
- Account management criticality
- Complex financial applications
- Document accessibility (statements, disclosures)
- Mobile banking accessibility
Common Issues:
- Online banking accessibility
- Application form accessibility
- Financial document accessibility (PDFs)
- Authentication accessibility
Education
Educational institutions—particularly higher education—face both ADA litigation and separate regulatory requirements under Section 504 and, for public institutions, Section 508.
Risk Factors:
- Learning management system accessibility
- Course content accessibility
- Application process accessibility
- Student portal functionality
Common Issues:
- LMS platform accessibility
- Lecture video captioning
- Course document accessibility
- Registration and application forms
Geographic Distribution
Website accessibility lawsuits concentrate in specific jurisdictions due to favorable legal precedents, plaintiff-friendly procedures, and attorney concentrations.
High-Volume Jurisdictions
New York: New York leads in federal website accessibility filings. The Southern District of New York (Manhattan) and Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn) see substantial case volumes. New York state law (New York Human Rights Law) provides additional plaintiff leverage.
California: California's Unruh Civil Rights Act provides statutory damages ($4,000 minimum per violation) that increase plaintiff incentive. California also has strong disability rights legal traditions.
Florida: Florida has become a major filing jurisdiction, with high volumes particularly in the Southern District (Miami). Florida consumer protection laws supplement federal ADA claims.
Why Geography Matters
Organizations headquartered or operating in high-volume jurisdictions face elevated exposure. However, website accessibility lawsuits can be filed against any organization with online presence serving customers in these states—effectively creating national exposure for any organization with public websites.
Plaintiff Patterns
Understanding who files accessibility lawsuits provides insight into litigation dynamics.
Serial Plaintiffs
A relatively small number of plaintiffs file large numbers of website accessibility lawsuits. Some individuals have filed hundreds of cases against different organizations. This pattern raises questions about litigation motivation but doesn't affect the underlying legal validity of accessibility requirements.
Law Firm Concentration
A small number of law firms specialize in website accessibility litigation, representing plaintiffs across numerous cases. These firms have developed efficient processes for identifying targets, documenting barriers, and pursuing settlements.
Testing Methodologies
Plaintiffs and their attorneys use both automated scanning tools and manual assistive technology testing to identify and document barriers. The combination of automated efficiency (finding targets) and manual documentation (establishing personal harm) creates efficient lawsuit factories.
Settlement Trends
Most website accessibility cases settle before trial. Settlement terms provide insight into litigation economics.
Typical Settlement Components
Monetary Payment: Settlement amounts vary widely based on organization size, violation severity, and negotiation dynamics. Small business settlements typically range from $5,000 to $50,000. Mid-size organizations see $15,000 to $100,000 settlements. Enterprise settlements can reach hundreds of thousands or millions.
Attorney Fees: The ADA allows prevailing plaintiffs to recover attorney fees. Settlement typically includes fee payment to plaintiff's counsel—often exceeding direct settlement payments.
Remediation Commitment: Settlements include commitments to remediate accessibility barriers, typically with specified timelines and WCAG conformance targets.
Monitoring: Some settlements require ongoing accessibility monitoring and periodic compliance reporting.
Settlement Cost Factors
Barrier Severity: More significant barriers affecting core functionality command higher settlements than minor issues.
Organization Size: Larger organizations with more resources typically pay larger settlements.
Legal Posture: Organizations demonstrating good-faith compliance efforts may achieve better settlement terms than those showing no accessibility attention.
Precedent Risk: Organizations in regulated industries or with brand reputation concerns may settle higher to avoid publicity.
Q&A: ADA Website Litigation
Q: Can my business be sued if we're small?
A: Yes. Small businesses face website accessibility lawsuits. While large retailers are frequently targeted, small businesses are not immune. Any business with a public website serving customers can potentially face litigation. Size may affect settlement amounts but not legal exposure.
Q: Does using an accessibility overlay protect against lawsuits?
A: No. Organizations using overlays have been sued and lost. Courts examine whether barriers exist—not whether technology has been installed. Overlays don't remove underlying accessibility barriers, so they don't provide lawsuit protection. For detailed analysis, see our Overlay vs Source Code Fixes guide.
Q: What should I do if I receive a demand letter?
A: Take it seriously. Engage legal counsel experienced in ADA matters. Document your current accessibility state. Evaluate the specific claims made. Consider your options: negotiate settlement, begin remediation, or prepare for litigation. Ignoring demand letters often leads to formal lawsuits. For strategic guidance, see our ADA Lawsuit Defense guide.
Q: How can I reduce lawsuit risk?
A: Proactive compliance reduces risk more effectively than reactive response. Implement WCAG 2.2 Level AA conformance through source code remediation. Deploy continuous monitoring to maintain compliance. Document your efforts. Create accessible feedback mechanisms so users can report barriers directly rather than through litigation.
Litigation Prevention Strategy
Organizations can significantly reduce lawsuit probability through proactive accessibility programs.
Proactive Measures
WCAG Conformance: Achieving and maintaining WCAG 2.2 Level AA conformance addresses the technical barriers that trigger lawsuits.
Continuous Monitoring: Ongoing accessibility monitoring catches issues before plaintiffs' attorneys do. Tools like TestParty's Spotlight provide continuous scanning with immediate alerting.
Accessibility Statement: Published accessibility statements demonstrate organizational commitment and provide contact mechanisms for users experiencing barriers.
Feedback Channel: Prominent, accessible mechanisms for users to report accessibility issues enable direct resolution before litigation.
Documentation: Maintain records of accessibility efforts—scans, remediation work, training, policy documents. This documentation demonstrates good faith if litigation occurs.
Response Preparation
Legal Relationships: Establish relationships with attorneys experienced in ADA web accessibility before you need them.
Incident Response Plan: Document procedures for responding to accessibility complaints and demand letters.
Insurance Review: Understand what your business insurance covers regarding ADA claims.
Industry-Specific Risk Assessment
E-commerce Risk Factors
| Factor | Low Risk | Medium Risk | High Risk |
|-----------------------|---------------|--------------------|---------------|
| Annual revenue | <$1M | $1M-$10M | >$10M |
| Product catalog size | <100 products | 100-1,000 | >1,000 |
| Geographic reach | Local | Regional | National |
| Transaction volume | Low | Medium | High |
| Current accessibility | WCAG AA | Partial compliance | No assessment |Healthcare Risk Factors
| Factor | Low Risk | Medium Risk | High Risk |
|-----------------------|------------------|--------------------|-------------------|
| Patient volume | Small practice | Regional system | Large system |
| Online services | Information only | Scheduling | Full portal |
| Regulatory status | Private | Mixed | Government-funded |
| Current accessibility | WCAG AA | Partial compliance | No assessment |Financial Services Risk Factors
| Factor | Low Risk | Medium Risk | High Risk |
|-----------------------|-------------|--------------------|-------------------|
| Customer base | Small | Regional | National |
| Online functionality | Information | Basic transactions | Full banking |
| Regulatory status | Minimal | Standard | Heavily regulated |
| Current accessibility | WCAG AA | Partial compliance | No assessment |The Cost of Inaction
Organizations comparing compliance investment to litigation risk should consider total exposure:
Direct Lawsuit Costs:
- Settlement payment: $10,000-$100,000+ (small to mid-size); potentially millions (enterprise)
- Plaintiff attorney fees: Often equal to or greater than settlement
- Defense attorney fees: $20,000-$100,000+ depending on case progression
- Staff time: Investigation, documentation, settlement negotiation
Indirect Costs:
- Expedited remediation: Litigation timelines force expensive rushed implementation
- Reputation impact: Public lawsuit filings affect brand perception
- Customer loss: Publicity about inaccessibility damages trust
- Ongoing monitoring: Settlement-mandated monitoring adds ongoing cost
Proactive Compliance Cost:
- Automated monitoring: $500-$5,000/month depending on site size
- Initial remediation: Variable based on current state
- Ongoing maintenance: Integrated into normal development processes
The economics strongly favor proactive compliance. A single avoided lawsuit covers years of compliance investment.
Taking Action
Website accessibility litigation isn't decreasing. Organizations operating online face ongoing and potentially increasing legal exposure. The most effective risk mitigation is genuine accessibility compliance through source code remediation.
Key steps:
- Assess current state through comprehensive accessibility scanning
- Implement remediation addressing identified WCAG violations
- Deploy continuous monitoring to maintain compliance
- Document efforts to demonstrate good faith
- Establish feedback channels for direct user communication
Schedule a TestParty demo and get a 14-day compliance implementation plan.
Related Resources
Automate the software work for accessibility compliance, end-to-end.
Empowering businesses with seamless digital accessibility solutions—simple, inclusive, effective.
Book a Demo