Government Website Section 508 & WCAG 2.2 Compliance Guide
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Understanding Section 508
- Section 508 Technical Requirements
- Functional Performance Criteria
- Implementation Requirements
- Common Government Website Issues
- Agency-Specific Considerations
- Procurement and Contracting
- Testing and Validation
- State and Local Government
- Remediation Priorities
- Resources
- Taking Action
- Related Resources
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies to make their electronic and information technology (ICT) accessible to people with disabilities. Updated in 2017 to align with WCAG 2.0, Section 508 now serves as the accessibility standard for all federal websites, applications, and digital services. State and local governments increasingly adopt these same standards.
This guide covers Section 508 requirements, implementation strategies, and compliance verification for government digital properties.
Understanding Section 508
Legal Framework
Section 508 is part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, amended in 1998 and updated in 2017:
Who must comply:
- Federal agencies
- Federal contractors
- Organizations receiving federal funding
- State/local governments (many adopt 508 standards)
What's covered:
- Websites and web applications
- Software and platforms
- Documents (PDFs, Office files)
- Multimedia content
- Hardware and kiosks
2017 Refresh
The 2017 update fundamentally changed Section 508:
Key changes:
- Adopted WCAG 2.0 Level AA for web content
- Harmonized with EN 301 549 (European standard)
- Functional performance criteria for non-web ICT
- Clearer documentation requirements
Current standard: WCAG 2.0 Level AA is mandatory; WCAG 2.1/2.2 adoption recommended.
Section 508 Technical Requirements
Web Content Standards (Chapter 5)
All web content must conform to WCAG 2.0 Level AA:
38 success criteria organized under POUR:
- Perceivable (guidelines 1.1-1.4)
- Operable (guidelines 2.1-2.4)
- Understandable (guidelines 3.1-3.3)
- Robust (guideline 4.1)
Software Standards (Chapter 5)
Applications must support assistive technologies:
Interoperability:
- Platform accessibility APIs
- Documented accessibility features
- Keyboard operability
- Focus management
User interface components:
- Name, role, value exposed
- State changes communicated
- Selection and focus visible
Hardware Standards (Chapter 4)
Physical ICT accessibility:
Operable parts:
- Controls reachable and operable
- Tactile identification
- Audio output options
Display screens:
- Adjustable brightness/contrast (where appropriate)
- Viewing angle considerations
Documents (Chapter 6)
Electronic documents must be accessible:
Requirements:
- Proper reading order
- Alternative text for images
- Accessible tables
- Document structure tags
- Accessible forms
Functional Performance Criteria
Backup Requirements
When technical standards don't cover specific functionality, agencies must meet functional performance criteria:
Without vision: Provide at least one mode operable without vision.
With limited vision: Support low vision and color blindness.
Without hearing: Visual alternatives for audio information.
With limited hearing: Volume controls and visual alerts.
Without speech: Alternatives to voice-based operation.
With limited manipulation: One-handed, sequential, and limited reach operation.
With limited reach and strength: Operable with minimal force.
With limited cognition: Simple, consistent operation.
Implementation Requirements
Agency Responsibilities
Federal agencies must:
Policy:
- Establish accessibility policy
- Designate Section 508 coordinator
- Document procedures
Procurement:
- Include accessibility in requirements
- Evaluate ICT for conformance
- Document exceptions
Development:
- Build accessibility into development processes
- Test before deployment
- Maintain compliance
Remediation:
- Address complaints
- Fix identified issues
- Track progress
Documentation Requirements
Accessibility Conformance Reports (ACR): Use VPAT format to document conformance status.
Exception documentation: When full conformance isn't achievable, document:
- Nature of exception
- Impact on users
- Alternative access methods
- Timeline for resolution
Common Government Website Issues
Navigation Problems
Mega menus: Complex navigation often keyboard-inaccessible.
<!-- Accessible mega menu structure -->
<nav aria-label="Main navigation">
<ul role="menubar">
<li role="none">
<button aria-expanded="false"
aria-haspopup="true"
aria-controls="services-menu">
Services
</button>
<ul id="services-menu" role="menu" hidden>
<li role="none">
<a role="menuitem" href="/benefits">Benefits</a>
</li>
<!-- More items -->
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</nav>Form Accessibility
Complex government forms:
- Multi-page applications
- Conditional fields
- Document uploads
- Signature requirements
<!-- Accessible form with proper structure -->
<form>
<fieldset>
<legend>Personal Information</legend>
<div class="form-group">
<label for="ssn">
Social Security Number (required)
<span class="format-hint">Format: XXX-XX-XXXX</span>
</label>
<input type="text" id="ssn"
aria-required="true"
pattern="\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{4}"
autocomplete="off">
</div>
</fieldset>
<!-- Progress indicator for multi-page forms -->
<div role="status" aria-live="polite">
Step 2 of 5: Personal Information
</div>
</form>Document Accessibility
PDF problems: Government sites often have inaccessible PDFs.
Requirements for accessible PDFs:
- Tagged structure
- Reading order defined
- Alt text for images
- Accessible tables
- Form fields labeled
- Language specified
Data Tables
Complex data presentations: Many government sites display statistical data.
<!-- Accessible complex data table -->
<table>
<caption>
Federal Budget Allocations by Department, FY 2024
<span class="summary">
All figures in millions of dollars.
</span>
</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" rowspan="2">Department</th>
<th scope="colgroup" colspan="2">FY 2023</th>
<th scope="colgroup" colspan="2">FY 2024</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="col">Budget</th>
<th scope="col">Actual</th>
<th scope="col">Budget</th>
<th scope="col">Projected</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Defense</th>
<td>$715,000</td>
<td>$720,500</td>
<td>$750,000</td>
<td>$745,000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>Agency-Specific Considerations
Public-Facing vs Internal
Public websites: Highest priority—direct citizen impact.
Internal systems:
- Employee-facing systems
- Reasonable accommodation required
- May need individual accommodations
Legacy Systems
Challenges:
- Older systems predate 508 refresh
- Limited vendor support
- Integration complexity
Approaches:
- Prioritize high-impact systems
- Document exceptions
- Provide alternative access
- Plan modernization
Third-Party Content
Embedded services:
- Payment processors
- Maps and location services
- Social media feeds
- Chat widgets
Responsibility: Agency remains responsible for accessibility of all content on their site.
Procurement and Contracting
ICT Procurement Requirements
FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation): Agencies must procure accessible ICT when available.
Procurement process:
- Include accessibility requirements in solicitation
- Evaluate vendor ACRs/VPATs
- Verify accessibility claims
- Include accessibility in contract
Evaluating Vendor Claims
ACR/VPAT review:
- Check evaluation date (recent?)
- Verify WCAG criteria covered
- Review "Supports" vs "Partially Supports"
- Examine remarks for detail
Questions for vendors:
- When was accessibility last tested?
- What testing methods were used?
- What's the remediation timeline for gaps?
- How are accessibility issues reported?
Contract Language
Include accessibility requirements in contracts:
The Contractor shall ensure that all deliverables
conform to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
(36 CFR 1194) and WCAG 2.0 Level AA success criteria.
The Contractor shall provide an Accessibility
Conformance Report (ACR) using the VPAT format
within 30 days of contract award and update it
with each major release.
The Contractor shall remediate accessibility
defects at no additional cost within 30 days
of notification.Testing and Validation
Testing Methodology
Automated testing: First-pass identification of technical issues.
Manual testing:
- Keyboard navigation
- Screen reader testing
- Cognitive walkthrough
- Color contrast verification
Assistive technology testing:
- JAWS (Windows)
- NVDA (Windows)
- VoiceOver (macOS/iOS)
- TalkBack (Android)
Testing Tools
Trusted resources:
- DHS Trusted Tester process
- ANDI (Accessible Name & Description Inspector)
- axe DevTools
- WAVE
DHS Trusted Tester: Standardized federal testing methodology ensuring consistent evaluation across agencies.
Ongoing Monitoring
Continuous compliance:
- Regular automated scans
- Periodic manual audits
- User feedback mechanisms
- Regression testing
State and Local Government
Adoption of Section 508
Many states adopt 508 or similar standards:
Common approaches:
- Direct 508 adoption
- State-specific policies referencing WCAG
- Procurement requirements
ADA Title II
State/local requirements: ADA Title II requires accessible programs and services.
DOJ interpretation: Recent guidance clarifies web accessibility requirements for state/local governments.
Remediation Priorities
Risk-Based Approach
Priority 1 (Critical):
- Content blocking keyboard users
- Missing form labels preventing submission
- Time limits without controls
- Focus traps
Priority 2 (High):
- Missing alt text on important images
- Insufficient color contrast
- Missing captions on videos
- Inaccessible navigation
Priority 3 (Medium):
- Decorative images not marked
- Heading hierarchy issues
- Minor contrast issues
- Missing skip links
Priority 4 (Low):
- Minor ARIA issues
- Redundant alt text
- Suboptimal markup
Resources
Government Resources
Section 508.gov: Official federal resource for Section 508 compliance.
GSA Accessibility Requirements Tool (ART): Helps identify accessibility requirements for procurements.
DHS Trusted Tester: Standardized testing methodology.
Training
Section 508 training: Free courses available through various federal programs covering policy, testing, and implementation.
Taking Action
Section 508 compliance requires sustained effort—integrating accessibility into policy, procurement, development, and operations. Start with high-traffic public-facing content, establish testing procedures, and build accessibility into agency culture.
TestParty provides the automated monitoring government agencies need for continuous Section 508 compliance.
Schedule a TestParty demo and get a 14-day compliance implementation plan.
Related Resources
Stay informed
Accessibility insights delivered
straight to your inbox.


Automate the software work for accessibility compliance, end-to-end.
Empowering businesses with seamless digital accessibility solutions—simple, inclusive, effective.
Book a Demo